
The AI Adoption Curve Isn’t “Coming”—It’s Here
We’re past the early tinkering stage.
ChatGPT isn’t a toy anymore; it’s a viable, volume-ready product used by everyone from students to professionals. Even my grandmother is on it.
I don’t just dabble in it—I live in it: refining prompts, fine-tuning models, doing real work. This isn’t a corner case. It’s mainstream.
The S-Curve Has Already Bent Upward
Analysts keep assuming a slow, cautious adoption curve for AI assistants, like with search or social networks in the past.
But the shift probably will mimic the uptake of ChatGPT type tools. It’s Going to be much faster.
ChatGPT is frictionless, intuitive, and generative. It’s eating traditional search for whole categories of questions. Instead of ten blue links, I get context, summaries, and insight in one place.
Google Search Feels Clumsy in Comparison
Go back to Google, you’re struck by how awkward and slow it feels.
Scrolling past SEO bait and ads to find real answers seems ancient. Even for complex research, the time-to-insight is worse.
If you use ChatGPT deeply, you see it. This isn’t theoretical—it’s personal, habitual, already here.
Chrome and Search Are at Risk of Displacement
This change won’t just hit Search.
Chat-based AI is evolving quickly:
- Images are already built-in.
- Video understanding is coming soon.
But it’s not just about summarizing videos.
Imagine using an AI assistant to actively explore competing perspectives on a topic, pulling in different creators and channels to help you compare views side by side.
Instead of getting trapped in YouTube’s recommendation loop—which feeds you more of what you already believe—AI could help break confirmation bias by suggesting counterpoints and broader context.
That’s not just a new feature. It’s a fundamental threat to how YouTube controls attention and keeps people in self-reinforcing bubbles.
Mapping and Navigation Could Also Be Absorbed
You can already use ChatGPT for simple questions like “how far is it between two places”.
If a robust mapping tool were integrated, you wouldn’t need Google Maps for directions.
Imagine Tesla’s Grok or ChatGPT itself eventually delivering integrated navigation, built into vehicles or even humanoid robots like Optimus.
These assistants aren’t just replacing search queries—they’re becoming universal interfaces for all kinds of information tasks.
Google’s Integration Strategy May Be Too Cautious
Google’s bet with Gemini is to make AI an invisible assistant inside Search and Docs.
It’s designed to avoid disrupting its own ad business or Workspace lock-in. But that’s precisely the problem:
- By staying cautious, it risks being outpaced.
- It can’t deliver the focused, fluid AI environment users want without cannibalizing its core.
Enterprises won’t buy Gemini as a standalone AI solution because it’s not designed that way. It’s a bolt-on, not a platform.
The Real Threat: Losing the Default Gateway
Google’s value rests on being the front door to the internet.
ChatGPT is becoming that door.
If users move there for answers, summaries, images, video exploration, and navigation, they’ll have no reason to open Chrome or type into Google Search.
Even if only the most engaged users defect first, that’s devastating—because they drive the highest-value ad spend.
Bottom Line
The market sees AI as a long-term opportunity, but this shift is accelerating now.
We’re already well into the S-curve.
If Google doesn’t adapt aggressively, it risks losing not just search queries, but the mindshare and attention that built its entire business.
Discover more from Priory House
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.